Is Your Inability to Use AI Due to Your Prompting Skills?
We conducted a survey on the actual usage, response quality, and reliability of AI among 500 business professionals who use generative AI in their work.
Please fill out the required information in the form and submit it. We will send you the download URL via email.
Report Overview
This report presents the findings of our survey regarding dissatisfaction with the reliability of generative AI in business operations and identifies the necessary steps to improve utilization levels.
According to the survey results, a total of 70.4% of respondents reported that they 'frequently' or 'sometimes' feel dissatisfied with the accuracy and reliability of AI responses. When asked about the causes, only 12.4% cited a 'lack of prompt skills,' while 61.4% pointed to the 'quality and limitations of the data referenced by AI,' highlighting the reality of the situation.
Furthermore, 72.8% of respondents spend five minutes or more each time verifying or fact-checking AI responses, revealing that the 'cost of using AI' is offsetting productivity gains. The most cited requirement for improving AI utilization levels was 'data accuracy and freshness,' indicating that establishing a robust data environment is the key to promoting the effective use of generative AI.
In addition, this report explores various perspectives, including the reality of tasks that 'cannot be left entirely to AI' and evaluations of accuracy when creating reports.
Please download the detailed report to learn more.
Recommended for the Following Professionals
Those who are using generative AI for business but are not seeing the expected results
Marketing and sales professionals who have concerns regarding AI accuracy and reliability
Those looking to review their company's AI utilization environment (data infrastructure)
Survey Overview
- Survey Method: Internet Research
- Survey Period: March 17, 2026 – March 19, 2026
- Survey Target: Business professionals who use generative AI for work (excluding part-time workers, students, etc.)
- Number of Respondents: 500
